Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Redefining Asceticism

While I was reading Marx’s Economic and Political Manuscripts of 1844, my attention was drawn to a particular passage in the section entitled “The Meaning of Human Requirements.” In this section starting on page 95, Marx draws certain similarities in the lifestyle of the worker and that of an ascetic. I become more and more convinced with every reading of this passage that Marx meant it this comparison as a sort of satirical criticism, but yet, I still believe the comparison is worth examining to see what Marx truly meant.

The practice of religious asceticism has been around for a long, long time. Asceticism has adopted many methods to detaching from the world and has managed to transcend the boundaries of religion; ascetics can be found in Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, and many other religions. The ultimate goal of the religious ascetic is to become unattached to the material world and its desires. They give up all luxury and often many of their needs. They will live on very minimal food, just enough to survive, will spend long amounts of time in meditation, and have very little possessions, if any. They detach themselves from family and friends and many live in isolated places or wander from place to place. Some have even developed self-mutilation tactics in order to detach themselves from the world and their bodies. The Buddha even practiced extreme asceticism before his enlightenment (which he ultimately determined to be the wrong path for reaching nirvana) and legend says at his most ascetic stage he looked like this:

Marx says the worker in the capitalistic economy becomes an ascetic because he is forced to live on very minimal means. In fact, living at the lowest possible level of life, which he denotes simply as existence, has become the standard, he argues. Capitalism “changes the worker into an insensible being lacking all needs,” (95). The goal of the capitalist ascetic, he claims, is to increase capital. So in order to have more, the worker lives on less and saves. Marx says, “The less you eat, drink, and read books; the less you go to the theatre, the dance hall, the public-house; the less you think, love, theorize, sing, paint, fence, etc., the more you save—the greater becomes your treasure which neither moths nor dust will devour—you capital,” (95-96).

It became clear to me that this was probably satire at the point that Marx calls political economy “the most moral of all the sciences,” (95). This aside, I believe this comparison is a poignant one to describe the mental state of the worker. While the religious ascetic denies himself to reach god or enlightenment, the worker denies himself to increase capital. I’d suggest here that the worker comes to view his capital with such importance that it becomes like a god to him. Everything in his existence becomes second to this ultimate goal, even his own needs, not just his desires. Capital is god.

4 comments:

  1. I want to first of all think you for clearing this up, i was not privy to this term, and as such did not fully understand this passage of Marx. I think that this satire is very enlightening to the state of the worker under capitalist society, however there is one distinct difference that i think you eluded to but did not explicitly state. This is, that the worker does not live on the most minimal resources by choice. Rather, he lives this way because the owner of the means of production drives wages down as low as possible, and forces the worker to live on the most minimal wage.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really like that you pointed all of this out. It certainly seems like Marx wants us to draw the parallels of capital to a kind of God. I think it is important to note this quote from "Profit of Capital:" "Capital is thus the governing power over labour and its products. The capitalist possesses this power, not on account of his personal or human qualities, but inasmuch as he is an owner of capital. His power is the purchasing power of his capital, which nothing can withstand." Perhaps Marx wants us to think of his minimalist system as a kind of salvation, an institution which will bestow power on all men, like religion, to reach something higher than himself. Just like religion, the power of being able to access capital makes man all-powerful instead. Capital may be the prime motivator, but I think the god-like power lies in the web of institutions that allow the common man to access capital buy his rewards for labor.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm glad you described this passage as well. I was unclear as to its meaning before. What you have described leads me to the same conclusions. It seems as though money and capital is what the worker is striving for, yet he will never reach his ultimate goal as he is not in control of the mans of production. Money becomes this unobtainable thing like God and salvation. The worker deprives himself of the things he wants in order to increase his capital. This is related to the comment I made on Cole's post, as it seems as simply having money is what is good. It's no longer about what you can get for your money, but how much money you simply have in your possession.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cole: The way I understand Marx's view of the worker is that his asceticism is both a choice and forced upon him. The expectation is for the worker to focus on increasing his capital, so in this sense, this kind of life is forced on him so that he can achieve the ultimate goal. In another, greater sense, however, the worker is choosing to live on the most minimal means. He works to increase his capital and survive, but he chooses live under his means so he can save up for an even greater capital. The system itself is forcing him to work towards this goal, but the worker chooses how far to take it.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.